'Liberty Coun 501 Ethics Comparison\r'

' morality enters analogy Paper H Michele Wallach Liberty University Online Abstract These outcomes regarding morality, Ameri bathroom management connection: grave of ethical motive (2005) and the American linkup of Christian Counseling: order of morals (2004), be available as a book of facts for use. The purpose of this publisher is to compare familiar and circumstantial elements of the two publications. There are two areas of general exploration: 1) relation to their format for retrieval of specialised data, 2) their value or modulars basis, if e actually, from which the publications are written.More specifically 3 specific areas go out be compared. First, the area of communicate coincide as it relates to the invitee and the counseling. Second, reckons relating to conduct for relationships with former(prenominal) guests. Third and lastly, is how a bit of the publications relates to the issue of abortion. Limitations were evident in that many commandments do not hug drug rationale. forthcoming review of revisions would be an effective part of association to use of both publications.The field of professional counselling provides for occasions for the exponent to make decisions establish on professional ethics. ethical motive can be usually derived from one’s own values. In sanctify to create a more consistent touchstone inscribes of ethics become been published. Two of these publications forget be used in this paper: 1) American Counseling Association (ACA): calculate of morality (2005), 2) American Association of Christian Counselors (AACC): recruit of Ethics (2004). Whereas these organizations are based on different ideals, a general relation will be made.Inasmuch as revisions are ongoing, this paper will review several that were revised in the latest publication, as highlighted in the article overbold Mandates and Imperatives in the Revised ACA enactment of Ethics. (2009) Section I: General comparison of the two codes The ACA: order of Ethics (2005) and the AACC: edict of Ethics (2004), to each one offer a logical breakdown of codes referring to situations of an ethical nature and is presented in a format that is easily referenced by both the seasoned professional and the novice.The design and layout of the ACA: Code of Ethics is laid out with color and artistic production and written very formally, giving a bank note of legal-ease. The ACA: Code of Ethics codes variance is formatted in columns, suggesting the sprint of a quick access guide. The ACA: Code of Ethics codes are cast up in sections with the scratch level header served by an pep pill moorage alphabet letter in chronological order, dispirited down further by a numeral value in chronological order, and then eventually sub-divided once more by a move case alphabet letter in chronological order.The AACC: Code of Ethics is laid out in a streamlined fashion and executed with a professional vernacular tone. The AACC : Code of Ethics has no color or specialty graphics adorning its pages and the codes section pages are laid out in a full page format without the use of columns. The AACC: Code of Ethics codes are set up in sections with the first level header served by and upper case Roman numeral, the next level is conduct by the upper case letters of the first two words of the section followed by a numeral value, with no spaces, the section is further sub-divided into numerical values carrying trine place values (i. . 100,101, and so on ) in chronological order. At this level, within each section, when a new sub-topic started the numeric value will move to the ten’s place chronologically. Is this master(prenominal)? Absolutely, it is the virtual road map to referencing where information can be found. Although the description here is in generalities, it is to the advantage of the rede professional to gain a working understanding of the layout. Understanding the way reference hooey is filed will assist the user immensely.An other structured piece of these publications explains why the reference has been constructed and written the way that is has. apiece of the references being compared contains similar information and some of the perspectives lap hide outing in many places AACC: Code of Ethics (2004) ACA: Code of Ethics (2005). The preliminary information in each publication, antecedent to the code of ethics, offers similarities. They both offer a preamble, mission, and a purpose for use. The ACA: Code of Ethics (2005) publication moves directly into the codes at this point. p 3) Whereas, the AACC: Code of Ethics (2004) offers a prayer and seven Biblical-ethical foundations, on which their codes of ethics were founded. (p 4, 5) Section II: Specific comparison of trinity particular areas Specific codes of each publication offer different interpretations of the same practices. The practice of informed bear according to the ACA: Code of Ethics (2005) is th at it is the counsellor’s righteousness to give a written and oral account for the rights and responsibilities of the counselor and the client.This responsibility even extends to cover the inclusion of an interpreter where it is deemed necessary. The practice of informed consent according to the AACC: Code of Ethics (2004) is that it is the counselor’s responsibility to â€Å"take care” that the client has the â€Å" depicted object”, â€Å" reason outably understands” and â€Å"freely gives consent” to the nature, process, costs, time, work, limits of the counseling and eliminate alternatives. All of this mustiness be done without â€Å"compulsion or un repayable allure”. (p 10, 11)The next set of codes differs greatly due in part by the influence of Biblical ensamples. The code in ACA: Code of Ethics (2005) is be as â€Å"Former Clients” (p 5) the code references only sexual and romantic interests of the former clien t and counselor. There is no mention of marriage. The code in any case extends to include â€Å"former clients, their romantic partners, or their family members”. The code simply states that the counselor cannot look at professional touching with the client within 5 years in the lead or after a relationship.The counselor must similarly â€Å"demonstrate forethought and document”, in writing, the possibilities of exploitation, or potential deadening to the former client. If any of these elements is present, then the counselor avoids the interaction or relationship. The code is AACC: Code of Ethics (2004) is defined as â€Å" spousal relationship with Former Clients/Patients” and the stipulations are explained that this type of relationship is allowed with three provisions. p 8) First, the counseling sessions had to have been terminated without the influence of a relationship or potential relationship, in addition within the proper guidelines of terminatio n as defined in the AACC: code of ethics guidelines. Secondly, the client must understand unequivocally that any further counseling must be by someone other than the counselor-spouse. Thirdly, there must be no harm to the client or the client’s family as a result in the change of the relationship between the client and the counselor.Lastly, the counseling or dowery relationship must be terminated at least two calendar years prior to marriage. There are occasions where an ethical standard is placeed by the AACC: Code of Ethics (2004) and not addressed at all by the ACA: Code of Ethics (2005). The AACC: Code of Ethics speaks specifically to the responsibility of the counselor to offer all possible alternatives and not to give any narrative of consent to an abortion. It also advises the counselor to continue to serve the client careless(predicate) of their decision regarding the pregnancy.The ACA: Code of Ethics does not address abortion specifically. There are areas of the code that speak to the issue in a general manner. The areas to be considered are: a) does the decision to have an abortion have any relation to the client’s face-to-face culture: b) the counselor’s own â€Å"values, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors” will need to be carefully guarded as to not be imposed on the client (p 4): and c) are the decisions the client is facing within the energy of the counselor to help guide the client.As in any client’s case being reviewed by a counselor or counseling classify all of these elements must be weighed out, as hearty as some that may not have been discussed in this paper. The ACA: Code of Ethics (2005) is written and alter based on an ever-changing world. The AACC: Code of Ethics is based on unchanging Biblical standards. It stands to reason that if an individual adheres to the AACC: Code of Ethics that a standard of consistency is more likely to be seen, due to the unchanging nature of the Bible. A Christian c ounselor may find both publications to be very useful.In the same way a non-Christian will in all probability have absolutely no use for the AACC: Code of Ethics (2004). No matter what an individual’s faith-related position is, as a professional counselor, it is the highest precession to first â€Å"do no harm” ACA: Code of Ethics (2005), and AACC: Code of Ethics (2004). The very backside of helping people through counseling requires that the counselor make a deliberate treatment cast to do no harm. With that understanding, it is the responsibility of the professional counselor to employ and explore whatever empirical resources are available to execute such a plan.References American Association of Christian Counselors: Code of Ethics. (2004). American Association of Christian Counselors A». Retrieved opulent 23, 2012, from http://www. aacc. net/about-us/code-of-ethics/ American Counseling Association: Code of Ethics. (2005). Ethics |http://www. counseling. org /CP/CT2. aspx|. Retrieved August 23, 2012, from http://www. counseling. org/Resources/CodeOfEthics/TP/Home/CT2. aspx New Mandates and Imperatives in the Revised ACA Code of Ethics. (2009). Journal of Counseling & Development, 87(2), 241-256.\r\n'